FindLaw Legal News
      http://news.findlaw.com
Wednesday, June 23, 2004

Jury deliberates in trial of man accused of killing sick uncle

By Emanuella Grinberg, Court TV

(Court TV) — A jury in Nezperce, Idaho, began deliberating Wednesday in the trial of a man accused of fatally shooting his cancer-stricken uncle.

The five men and seven women, two of whom are mother and son, began deliberations after the defense rested its case and closing arguments were delivered in the second-degree murder trial.

Idaho Deputy Attorney General Scott James asked the 12 jurors to put aside their sympathy for Craig Perry, 57, and convict him of murdering 83-year-old Robert Perry, who had been diagnosed with terminal throat cancer.

"If sympathy is the victor in this battle then justice is the loser," James said. "This is a good man who did the wrong thing. But good people are held to the same standards as bad people in a jury room."

James was brought in from the Idaho Attorney General's office in Boise to assist Lewis County elected prosecutor Kimron Torgerson in the county's first murder trial in 13 years. Nezperce has 523 residents, and the county a little more than 3,000.

The state's case against the carpenter from Pocatello, Idaho, relied heavily on forensic evidence to place Craig Perry in the same room as his uncle when he died from two gunshot wounds to the back of the head.

Blood spatter expert Rod Englert testified that the pattern of blood found on the defendant's pants was consistent with "blowback" blood — blood from the shooting itself — which would indicate Perry was standing near his uncle when the gun was fired.

The defense claimed Robert Perry had coughed up the blood onto his nephew's pants, as he was prone to doing as his condition worsened.

"This isn't a coincidence that earlier the defendant got some aspirated blood on his pants, and it happened to line up that way," James said. "You see no blood on the defendant, other than the small amount of high-velocity blood spatter on his pants."

James pointed out the testimony of gunshot wound pathologist Dr. Vincent Di Maio, who testified last week that it was unlikely Perry could have shot himself from behind.

"He told you that simply the fact that the shot is at the back of the head makes it less than five percent likely that it could be a suicide," James said of Di Maio, who is also the chief medical examiner of Bexar County, Texas, in San Antonio.

"Then he told you the fact that there were two shots makes it even more unusual," James said.

Defense attorney James Siebe told the jury during his own closing argument that probability was not proof beyond a reasonable doubt of Perry's guilt.

"There is no textbook on suicide. Each and every circumstance is different," said Siebe, reminding the jury of testimony that the 83-year-old talked of suicide several times before his death.

Craig Perry testified on his own behalf Wednesday, saying he was preparing a nebulizer for his uncle in the kitchen of Robert Perry's mobile home when he heard gunshots coming from the bedroom.

Three days before his death, Robert Perry went to the emergency room coughing up blood. He was discharged and told there was no need for him to come back — nothing more could be done for him.

"He's afraid to go to sleep because he doesn't want to choke. He's just supposed to sit and wait to drown in his own blood?" Siebe said.

"He's an independent, proud man, old school. He gives his dog away. You think that means he thinks he's going to get better?" the lawyer continued.

Perry faces 10 years to life in prison if convicted. Jury deliberations will continue Thursday.


Company | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer Copyright © 1994-2009 FindLaw