FindLaw Sports Law Resources

You Make the Call... is a publication of the National Sports Law Institute of Marquette University Law School.

Winter 2000
Volume 2, Issue 3
Cureton v. NCAA
Stanley v. University of Southern California
Hayden v. University of Notre Dame
Charpentier v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co. Inc.
Johnny Blastoff Inc. v. Los Angeles Rams Football Co.
Cardtoons v. Major League Baseball Players Association
Davis v. Monroe Board of Education
Washington v. IHSAA

Washington v. IHSAA, 181 F.3d 840 (7th Cir., June 23, 1999)

STUDENT'S LEARNING DISABILITY PRECLUDES SANCTIONING BY ATHLETIC GOVERNING BODY

Eric Washington is a learning disabled student at Central Catholic High School in Lafayette, Indiana. Despite his long history of academic problems, he was allowed to advance to high school. During Washington's freshman year in high school (1996-97), a school counselor suggested that he drop out because he was having severe difficulty with his schoolwork.

In the summer of 1997, Washington was playing in a three on three-basketball tournament when the Central Catholic coach, Chad Dunwoody, noticed his outstanding ability. Dunwoody, who was also a schoolteacher, convinced Washington to reenroll at Central Catholic. Dunwoody began serving as Washington's academic counselor and suggested that Washington be tested for learning disabilities even though prior tests failed to indicate any disabilities. Results of new tests indicated that Washington does have a learning disability.

The Indiana High School Athletic Association (IHSAA) has a rule limiting athletic eligibility to eight semesters following the student's commencement of the ninth grade. This rule was implemented to discourage coaches from red shirting their players and to promote competitive equality and student safety.

Washington applied for a waiver of the eight-semester rule under an IHSAA rule providing that the eight semester rule can be waived if a student withdraws completely from school due to an injury and receives no academic credit during that time. Washington also relied on a the hardship rule allowing the IHSAA to avoid strict construction of its bylaws if such enforcement would promote undue hardship in a particular case. The IHSAA denied Washington's request for a waiver.

Washington then filed suit against IHSAA alleging violations of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (a) and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. Both acts require reasonable modifications of a program or activity for the disabled if such modifications would not fundamentally alter the overall purpose of the subject activity.

The trial court held that a waiver of the eight-semester rule in Washington's case would be a reasonable modification because such a waiver would not conflict with the rule's purposes. The IHSAA's primary goal is to enhance education through athletics participation. The court ruled that failing to accommodate Washington would contravene this goal. The court of appeals affirmed this decision and held that the potential harm to the IHSAA would be insignificant if this rule is waived for Washington.

WEBFIND at http://laws.findlaw.com/7th/991003.html

 

Top of Page

You Make the Call. . . Index

 


"You Make The Call..." is a newsletter published four times per year (spring, summer, fall, winter) by the National Sports Law Institute of Marquette University Law School, PO Box 1881, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53201-1881. (414) 288-5815, fax (414) 288-5818, munsli@vms.csd.mu.edu. (www.marquette.edu/law/sports/call.html). This publication is distributed via fax and email to individuals in the sports field upon request.
Editorial Staff:
Paul M. Anderson, Editor & Designer
Kirsten Hauser, Associate Editor

 

Copyright © 1999 -- All rights reserved.

Ads by FindLaw