FindLaw Sports Law Resources

You Make the Call... is a publication of the National Sports Law Institute of Marquette University Law School.

Summer 1999
Volume 2, Issue 1

Minnesota Twins Partnership v. State of Minnesot
Shaw v. Dallas Cowboys Football Club
Ortiz-Del Valle v. National Basketball Association
Adidas America v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
Baum Research & Development v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co.
Alston v. Virginia High School League, Inc.
Miller v. Wilkes
Caruso v. Blockbuster/Sony Music Entertainment Centre at the Waterfront

Shaw v. Dallas Cowboys Football Club, 172 F.3d 299 (3rd Cir., 1999)

SATELLITE BROADCASTS OF NFL GAMES NOT EXEMPT FROM ANTITRUST SCRUTINY

In 1995, the league made available to residential and commercial satellite dish owners telecasts of all regular season Sunday afternoon NFL games telecast by NBC and Fox through DIRECTV. The 1996-97 subscription rates for this service, dubbed the "NFL Sunday Ticket," were $199.00 per year for residential use, and from $399.00 to $29,999.00 for commercial establishments.

In this case, the plaintiffs alleged that the NFL's member teams agreed to fix the prices of the satellite transmissions and restrict the outputs of their games, in violation of antitrust laws.

In 1961, the Sports Broadcasting Act (SBA) was created. The SBA made pooled television rights for professional sports exempt from antitrust litigation. However, the SBA was intended to only exempt commercial television. Courts have usually narrowly construed exemptions, such as the SBA, to antitrust laws.

DIRECTV is considered to be a non-sponsored telecast with its pre-paid commercial-free package. In the case, the court noted that the NFL has rights in the games themselves and that these rights include the right to sell the images of those games for broadcast. However, to adopt the NFL's argument that it is a sponsored telecast with commercials, Judge Carol Los Mansmann wrote "would allow the exception to swallow the rule: a sponsored telecast to a limited geographic area would secure an antitrust exemption for nationwide sales."

Therefore DIRECTV, which does not have commercial sponsors, was not such a sponsored telecast exempt under the SBA. In addition, at the time the SBA was created satellite transmissions were not covered because the technology did not exist. The ruling opens the door for a class action suit alleging that the league and its member teams have conspired to fix the price of private satellite transmissions of Sunday afternoon game telecasts.

WEBFIND at http://www.caselaw.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=3rd&navby=case&no=992118P

 

Top of Page

You Make the Call. . . Index

 


"You Make The Call..." is a newsletter published four times per year (spring, summer, fall, winter) by the National Sports Law Institute of Marquette University Law School, PO Box 1881, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53201-1881. (414) 288-5815, fax (414) 288-5818, munsli@vms.csd.mu.edu. (www.marquette.edu/law/sports/call.html). This publication is distributed via fax and email to individuals in the sports field upon request.
Editorial Staff:
Paul M. Anderson, Editor & Designer
Kirsten Hauser, Associate Editor

 

Copyright © 1999 -- All rights reserved.

Ads by FindLaw