FindLaw Investigations - Microsoft
News | Web Sites | Documents | Message Boards
 
Microsoft Trial Documents

  • [12/31/01] Defendant Microsoft Corp.'s Reply In Support Of It's Motion To Amend The Scheduling Order[PDF]
  • [12/31/01] Plaintiff Litigating States' Opposition To Microsoft Corporation's Motion To Amend The Scheduling Order [PDF]
  • [12/21/01] Defendant Microsoft Corp.'s Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order [PDF]
  • [12/07/01] Plaintiff Litigating States' Remedial Proposals [PDF]
  • [12/03/01] Complaint (West Virginia v. Microsoft) [PDF]
  • [11/15/01] Competitive Impact Statement [PDF]
  • [11/09/01] Order Directing Litigation Proceed on "Two Tracks" b/c of Settlement[PDF]
  • [11/06/01] Revised Stipulation and Revised Proposed Final Judgment [PDF]
  • [11/06/01] Microsoft Corporation's Submission Regarding Further Proceedings [PDF]
  • [11/02/01] Order Setting Nov. 6, 2001 Status Conference [PDF]
  • [11/02/01] Stipulation and Proposed Final Judgment [PDF]
  • [10/16/01] Order Appointing Prof. Eric D. Green as Facilitator/Mediator [PDF]
  • [09/06/01] Order Establishing Procedures for Electronic Filing [PDF]
  • [08/31/01] Brief of United States in Opposition (to Petition for Certiorari) [PDF]
  • [08/29/01] Order Denying Motion for Expedited Status Conference as Moot [PDF]
  • [08/29/01] Plaintiff's Motion For An Expedited Status Conference [PDF]
  • [08/28/01] Order Setting Sept. 21, 2001 Status Conference [PDF]
  • [08/17/01] Court Of Appeals Order Denying Microsoft's Motion To Stay Mandate [PDF]
  • [08/14/01] Microsoft's Reply In Support of Motion for Stay of the Mandate Pending For Writ of Certiorari [PDF]
  • [08/10/01] Government Response To Microsoft's Motion to Stay Mandate[PDF]
  • [08/07/01] Microsoft Motion for a Stay of Mandate Pending Petition for Writ of certioriari, with Appendix [PDF]
  • [08/02/01] Appeals Court Order Denying Request for Rehearing [PDF]
  • [07/26/01] Government Response To Microsoft's Petition For Rehearing [PDF]
  • [07/19/01] Addendum to Microsoft Corp.'s Petition for Rehearing [PDF]
  • [07/19/01] D.C. Circuit Order Setting August 3, 2001 Response Deadline for Appellees [PDF]
  • [07/18/01] Microsoft Corporation's Petition for Rehearing [PDF]
  • [07/13/01] Government Motion for Immediate Issuance of a Mandate [PDF]
  • [02/09/01] Brief For Appellees U.S. And State Plaintiffs In The Microsoft Appeal [HTML] [PDF]
  • [01/29/01] Microsoft's Reply Brief To The U.S. Court of Appeals [HTML]

  • [11/27/00] Microsoft's Appellate Brief [HTML] [Word]
  • [10/03/00] Appellees' Joint Response to Microsoft's Motion to Govern [PDF]
  • [10/02/00] Microsoft's Motion For An Order Governing Further Proceedings [PDF]
  • [09/26/00] U.S. Supreme Court Decision Denying Direct Appeal [PDF]
  • [08/22/00] Microsoft's Reply Brief To The Supreme Court Of The United States [HTML]
  • [08/15/00] Brief for U.S. in Response to Jurisdictional Statement [PDF]
  • [07/25/00] Jurisdictional Statement to the Supreme Court [HTML]
  • [06/20/00] District Court Order [PDF]
  • [06/19/00] Court of Appeals Order (U.S. v. Microsoft) [PDF]
  • [06/19/00] Court of Appeals Order (State of New York v. Microsoft) [PDF]
  • [06/07/00] Memorandum and Order [HTML] [PDF]
  • [06/07/00] Final Judgment [HTML] [PDF]
  • [06/13/00] Court of Appeals Order (U.S. v. Microsoft) [PDF]
  • [06/13/00] Court of Appeals Order (State of New York v. Microsoft) [PDF]
  • [06/07/00] Memorandum and Order [HTML] [PDF]
  • [06/07/00] Final Judgment [HTML] [PDF]
  • [06/06/00] Microsoft's Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Microsoft's Comments on Their Revised Proposed Final Judgment [HTML]
  • [06/05/00] Plaintiff's Summary Response To Microsoft's Comments On Revised Proposed Final Judgment [HTML] [PDF]
  • [05/31/00] Microsoft's Supplemental Offer Of Proof [HTML]
  • [05/31/00] Microsoft's Comments on Plaintiffs' Revised Proposed Final Judgment [HTML]
  • [05/22/00] Microsoft Corporation's Reply In Further Support Of Its Motion For Summary Rejection Of Breakup Proposal [ HTML ]
  • [05/19/00] Brief On Remedy Of Amici Curiae, Computer Communications Indus. Ass'n and Software And Information Indus. Ass'n [ PDF ]
  • [05/17/00] Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum In Support Of Proposed Final Judgment [PDF ]
  • [05/10/00] Microsoft Corporation's Proposed Final Judgment [HTML]
  • [05/10/00] Microsoft's Memorandum In Support Of Its Proposed Final Judgment [HTML]
  • [05/10/00] Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Position As To Future Proceedings On The Issue Of Remedy [HTML]
  • [05/10/00] Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Memorandum In Support Of Its Motion For Summary Rejection Of The Government's Breakup Proposal [HTML]
  • [05/10/00] Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Motion For Summary Rejection Of The Governmentês Breakup Proposal [ HTML]
  • [04/28/00] Microsoft Plaintiffs' Proposed Final Judgment [ PDF]
  • [04/03/00] Microsoft Conclusions Of Law And Order [ HTML] [ PDF]
  • [11/05/00] Microsoft Anti-Trust Trial Findings Of Fact [HTML ] [ PDF ] [ WordPerfect] (no Word Version)
  • [06/13/00] Court of Appeals Order (U.S. v. Microsoft) [PDF]
  • [06/13/00] Court of Appeals Order (State of New York v. Microsoft) [PDF]
  • [06/07/00] Memorandum and Order [HTML] [PDF]
  • [06/07/00] Final Judgment [HTML] [PDF]
  • [06/06/00] Microsoft's Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Microsoft's Comments on Their Revised Proposed Final Judgment [HTML]
  • [06/05/00] Plaintiff's Summary Response To Microsoft's Comments On Revised Proposed Final Judgment [HTML] [PDF]
  • [05/31/00] Microsoft's Supplemental Offer Of Proof [HTML]
  • [05/31/00] Microsoft's Comments on Plaintiffs' Revised Proposed Final Judgment [HTML]
  • [05/22/00] Microsoft Corporation's Reply In Further Support Of Its Motion For Summary Rejection Of Breakup Proposal [ HTML ]
  • [05/19/00] Brief On Remedy Of Amici Curiae, Computer Communications Indus. Ass'n and Software And Information Indus. Ass'n [ PDF ]
  • [05/17/00] Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum In Support Of Proposed Final Judgment [ PDF ]
  • [05/10/00] Microsoft Corporation's Proposed Final Judgment [ HTML ]
  • [05/10/00] Microsoft's Memorandum In Support Of Its Proposed Final Judgment [HTML]
  • [05/10/00] Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Position As To Future Proceedings On The Issue Of Remedy [ HTML ]
  • [05/10/00] Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Memorandum In Support Of Its Motion For Summary Rejection Of The Government's Breakup Proposal [ HTML ]
  • [05/10/00] Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Motion For Summary Rejection Of The GovernmentÍs Breakup Proposal [ HTML ]
  • [04/28/00] Microsoft Plaintiffs' Proposed Final Judgment [ PDF ]
  • [04/03/00] Microsoft Conclusions Of Law And Order [ HTML ] [ PDF ]
  • [11/05/00] Microsoft Anti-Trust Trial Findings Of Fact [ HTML ] [ PDF ] [ WordPerfect ] (no Word Version)

    Filings by USDOJ.

  • Plaintiffs' Joint Proposed Findings of Fact - Revised (9/10/99)
  • Plaintiffs' Response to Microsoft's Proposed Findings (9/10/99)
  • Plaintiffs' Joint Proposed Findings of Fact (8/10/99)
  • Direct Testimony
  • Deposition Transcripts
  • Trial Exhibits
  • Deposition Notices
  • Complaint
  • Briefs: Memorandum of the United States in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
  • Briefs: Declaration of Frank M. Fisher
  • Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents or,In the Alternative, for an In Camera Inspection of Documents (6/16/99)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Joint RebuttalWitness List (5/3/99)
  • Plaintiffs' Response to and Motion to Strike"Representation of Microsoft Corporation" and Request for Leave of Court to ConductLimited Additional Discovery Relating Thereto (12/21/98)
  • Plaintiffs' Opposition to Microsoft Corporation's Motion toStrike the Direct Testimony of Dr. Avadis Tevanian Relating to Technical Incompatibilities(11/23/98)
  • Plaintiffs' Response to Microsoft's Motion in Limine toExclude Portions of the Direct Testimony of Dr. Avadis Tevanian, Jr. (11/2/98)
  • Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Microsoft's Motion for Discovery Sanctions (10/26/98)
  • Plaintiffs' Opposition to Microsoft's Motion to Strike the Government's Deposition Designations (10/23/98)
  • Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Corrected Witness Statements (10/21/98)
  • Plaintiffs' Opposition to Microsoft's Motion in Limine to Exclude Hearsay Statements in the Direct Examination of Jim Barksdale (10/20/98)
  • Plaintiff's Opposition to Microsoft Motion for Protective Order with Respect to Sixth Joint Request for Production of Documents (10/20/98)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Reply in Support of Emergency Motion to Compel (10/19/98)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Further Emergency Motion to Compel Microsoft Corporation and Memorandum in Support (10/16/98)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Motion to Place Written Direct Testimony of Witnesses Temporarily Under Seal Until the Day Prior to the Witness' Court Appearance, and Memorandum in Support; and Proposed Order (10/13/98)
  • Appendix B to Plaintiffs' Pretrial Statement Plaintiffs' List of Trial Exhibits (10/13/98)
  • Appendix C to Plaintiffs' Pretrial Statement List of Deposition Designations and Microsoft Admissions (10/13/98)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Reply to Microsoft Corporation's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion to Compel Production of Databases (10/8/98)
  • U.S. v. Microsoft Corporation -- Appendix A to United States' and Plaintiff States' Schedule of Witnesses (10/8/98)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Joint Pretrial Statement (10/6/98)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Memorandum in Support of Renewed Motion to Compel Microsoft Corporation to Produce Databases (10/2/98)
  • Brief for Appellee United States of America Filed in the United States Court of Appeals for The District of Columbia Circuit (9/22/98)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Memorandum in Opposition to Microsoft Corporation's Motion to Limit Trial (9/3/98)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Microsoft Corporation (9/2/98)
  • Plaintiff United States' Motion to Compel Microsoft Corporation to Comply with Discovery (9/2/98)
  • Plaintiffs' Joint Response to Microsoft's Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of Motions for Preliminary Injunction (8/31/98)
  • Opposition of the United States of America to Appellant Microsoft Corporation's Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal of the August 11, 1998 Order (8/14/98)
  • United States' Opposition to Microsoft Corporation's Motion for a Stay (8/12/98)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Opposition to Microsoft's Motion to Modify Stipulation and Protective Order (8/5/98)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Microsoft Corporation (7/31/98)
  • United States' Motion to Compel Microsoft Corporation to Comply with Discovery (7/31/98)
  • Declaration of Frank M. Fisher (5/18/98)
  • Declaration of David S. Sibley (5/18/98)
  • Memorandum of the United States in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (5/18/98)
  • Complaint (5/18/98)
  • Briefs: Declaration of David S. Sibley

    Microsoft's Answer to May 1998 Complaint

  • Microsoft Corporation's Designation of Rebuttal Witnesses and Description of Rebuttal Witness Testimony (5/3/99)
  • Microsoft Corporation's Emergency Motion to Compel AOL, Netscape and Sun to Product All E-Mail Messages Responsive to Microsoft's Subpoenas (3/29/99)
  • Microsoft Corporation's Opposition to Motion by Gravity, Inc. to Intervene for Purpose of Modifying Protective Order (3/23/99)
  • Court Order requiring DOJ to produce documents pertaining to the pending AOL/Netscape/Sun agreement (1/22/99)
  • Microsoft Corporation's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (1/13/99)
  • Defendant Microsoft CorporationÕs Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissible Statements in the Direct Testimony of William Harris (12/30/98)
  • Representation of Microsoft Corporation re: Dr. Edward Felten's Testimony That Microsoft Interfered With His "Prototype Removal Program" (12/16/98)
  • Microsoft's Motion for Leave of the Court to Initiate Discovery Concerning AOLÕS Acquisition (12/7/98)
  • Microsoft Corporation's Motion to Strike the Direct Testimony of Avadis Tevanian, Jr. Relating to Alleged Technical Incompatibilities (11/10/98)
  • Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Reply in Support of its Motion for Sanctions (10/28/98)
  • Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Reply in Support of its Motion for A Limited Modification of the Protective Order (10/28/98)
  • Reply in Support of its Motion in Limine to Strike the Government's Improper Deposition (10/26/98)
  • Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Motion for Sanctions (10/26/98)
  • Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion to Compel (10/16/98)
  • Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Motion for Leave of the Court to Initiate Discovery Concerning New Witnesses (10/09/98)
  • Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Motion for Leave of the Court to Alter its Witness List (10/09/98)
  • Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Motion for a Continuance Needed to Address Testimony of Plaintiffs' New Trial Witnesses (10/09/98)
  • Defendant Microsoft CorporationÕs Objections to Plaintiffs' New Requests for Relief and Attempt to Expand this Case Beyond the Allegations in the Complaints (10/08/98)
  • Schedule of Witnesses to be Called by Defendant Microsoft Corporation (10/08/98)
  • Pretrial Statement (10/06/98)
  • Arguments for Excluding Extraneous Last-Minute Issues from Trial (09/16/98)
  • Supplemental Memo on Integration of Internet Explorer Technologies Into Windows 98 (09/14/98)
  • Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment(09/08/98)
  • Witnesses Will Prove MicrosoftÕs Product Innovation Was Designed to Benefit Consumers and Developers (09/04/98)
  • Motion to Limit Issues for Trial (09/02/98)
  • Brief for Defendant-Appellant (09/01/98)
  • Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal of the August 11, 1998 Order (08/17/98)
  • Motion for Stay Pending Appeal of the Courts Order Allowing Media to Attend Pretrial Deposition (08/11/98)
  • Motion of Appellant Microsoft Corporation for a Stay Pending Appeal of the August 11, 1998 Order Permitting Members of the Public to Attend All Pretrial Depositions (08/11/98)
  • Material Facts as to Which Microsoft Corporation Contends There is no Genuine Issue (08/10/98)
  • Motion for Summary Judgment (08/10/98)
  • Microsoft Response to DOJ Motion (08/04/98)
  • Statement by Microsoft Corporation (07/28/98)
  • Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Answer to the Complaint Filed by the U.S. Department of Justice (07/28/98)
  • Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Answer to Plaintiff StatesÕ First Amended Complaint and Counterclaim (07/28/98)
  • Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Answer to the Complaint Filed by the U.S. Department of Justice (07/28/98)
  • Microsoft's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Compel Novell, Inc. to Comply with the Subpoena Dated June 10, 1998 (07/23/98)
  • Federal - Motion to Consolidate (05/21/98)
  • Federal - Motion for Fair and Reasonable Schedule (05/21/98)
  • State - Motion for Fair and Reasonable Schedule (05/21/98)


    1994 DOJ - Microsoft Consent Decree and Documents Related to Current Litigation

  • US - Microsoft Consent Decree (7/15/94)

    US DC Circuit Court of Appeals

  • Motion for Expedited Consideration and for an Expedited Briefing Schedule (Microsoft 12/16/97)
  • Response of the United States to Appellant Microsoft's Motion for Expedited Consideration and for an Expedited Briefing (USDOJ 12/22/97)
  • Microsoft's Reply in support of expedited consideration of Microsoft's appeal (Microsoft 12/23/97)

    Ruling US DC Circuit Court of Appeals granted Microsoft's request for an expedited hearing. (12/30/97)

  • Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and Motion for Stay of Proceedings (US DC Circuit of Appeals, Microsoft 1/16/98)
  • Response of the United States to Microsoft Corporation's Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and Motion for Stay of Proceedings (USDOJ 1/27/98)
  • Reply of Petitioner Microsoft Corporation in Support of its Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and Motion for Stay of Proceedings (Microsoft 1/30/98)

  • Brief For Respondent-Appellant (Microsoft 1/29/98)
  • Microsoft's Reply Brief in Special Master Appeal (Microsoft 1/30/98)
  • Brief of Appellee United States (USDOJ 3/2/98)
  • Microsoft's Reply Brief for Respondent-Appellant (Microsoft 3/09/98)
  • On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus - Supplemental Brief of the United States in Opposition (USDOJ 4/7/98)
  • Microsoft's Supplemental Brief For Petitioner (Microsoft 4/07/98)
  • Microsoft's Motion for a Stay of the Preliminary Injunction Insofar as it Relates to Windows 98 (Microsoft 5/05/98)
  • Support of Microsoft's motion for a stay of the preliminary injunction insofar as it relates to Windows 98. (Microsoft 5/05/98)
  • Response of the United States to Appellant Microsoft Corporation's Motion For a Stay of the Preliminary Injunction Insofar as it Relates to Windows 98 (USDOJ 5/7/98)
  • Motion of Appellant Microsoft Corporation for a Stay Pending Appeal of the August 11, 1998 Order Permitting Members of the Public to Attend All Pretrial Depositions (Microsoft 08/11/98)
  • Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal of the August 11, 1998 Order (Microsoft 08/17/98)

    US District Court

  • Court Orders and Decisions
  • 1998 Orders
  • Memorandum and Order - Microsoft ordered to unbundle Internet Explorer from Windows 95. (12/11/97)
  • Order of Reference to Special Master - Lawrence Lessig appointed a Special Master. (12/11/97)
  • Memorandum and Order - Microsoft's request to remove Lawrence Lessig as Special Master is denied. (1/14/98)
  • Stipulation and Order (1/22/98)

  • Petition by the United States for an Order to Show Cause Why Respondent Microsoft Corporation Should Not Be Found In Civil Contempt (USDOJ 10/97)
  • Memorandum of the United States in Support of Petition for an Order to Show Cause Why Respondent Microsoft Corporation Should Not Be Found In Civil Contempt (USDOJ 10/97)
  • Memorandum in Opposition to Petition of the United States for an Order to Show Cause Why Respondent Microsoft Corporation Should Not Be Found In Civil Contempt (Microsoft 11/10/97)
  • Reply Brief of Petitioner United States of America (USDOJ 11/20/97)
  • United States' Response to Microsoft's Sur-Reply (USDOJ 12/4/97)
  • Motion of the United States to Unseal Documents Filed with United States' Reply Brief and Documents Filed by Microsoft with its Response Brief (USDOJ 11/97)
  • Letter by David A. Heiner Senior Corporate Attorney of Microsoft to Phillip R. Malone of the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division claiming that Microsoft was complying fully with the court's order (with the 3 options, an WIN95 OS with IE, a two year old version of WIN95 and a current version with IE removed (which does not boot/work (and thus IE is integrated and essential to OS :)), refuting the DOJ's allegations that Microsoft was not in compliance. (Microsoft 12/97)
  • Motion by the United States for Judgment Of Civil Contempt and to Enforce Preliminary Injunction (USDOJ 12/17/97)
  • Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion of the United States for Judgment of Civil Contempt and to Enforce Preliminary Injunction (Microsoft 12/23/97)
  • Reply Memorandum of the United States in Support of its Motion for Judgment of Civil Contempt and to Enforce Preliminary Injunction (USDOJ 12/29/97)
  • United States' Memorandum in Opposition to Microsoft'S Motion to Revoke Reference to Special Master and to Stay Further Proceedings Before Special MASTER (USDOJ 1/5/98)
  • Motion of Respondent Microsoft Corporation for a Definite Description of the Alleged "Other Product" (Microsoft 1/9/98)
  • Memorandum of the United States in Opposition to Microsoft's Motion for a Definite Description of the Alleged "Other" Product (USDOJ 1/20/98)
  • Proposed Findings of Fact Submitted by Respondent Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft 1/19/98)
  • United States' Proposed Findings of Fact (USDOJ 1/19/98)
  • Stipulation and Order Submitted by Microsoft (Microsoft 1/22/98)
  • Federal - Motion to Consolidate (Microsoft 05/21/98)
  • Federal - Motion for Fair and Reasonable Schedule (Microsoft 05/21/98)
  • State - Motion to Consolidate (Microsoft 05/21/98)
  • State - Motion for Fair and Reasonable Schedule (Microsoft 05/21/98)
  • Microsoft's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Compel Novell, Inc. to Comply with the Subpoena Dated June 10, 1998 (Microsoft 07/23/98)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Microsoft Corporation (USDOJ 7/31/98)
  • United States' Motion to Compel Microsoft Corporation to Comply with Discovery (USDOJ 7/31/98)
  • Microsoft Response to DOJ Motion (Microsoft 08/04/98)
  • United States' and Plaintiff States' Opposition to Microsoft's Motion to Modify Stipulation and Protective Order (USDOJ 8/5/98)
  • Material Facts as to Which Microsoft Corporation Contends There is no Genuine Issue (Microsoft 08/10/98)
  • Motion for Summary Judgment (Microsoft 08/10/98)
  • Motion for Stay Pending Appeal of the Courts Order Allowing Media to Attend Pretrial Deposition (08/11/98)
  • Motion for Stay Pending Appeal of the Courts Order Allowing Media to Attend Pretrial Deposition (Microsoft 08/11/98)
  • United States' Opposition to Microsoft Corporation's Motion for a Stay (USDOJ 8/12/98)
  • Opposition of the United States of America to Appellant Microsoft Corporation's Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal of the August 11,1998 Order (USDOJ 8/14/98)


    Other Consent Decree Documents - Before the Consent Decree took effect, US District Judge Sporkin ruled that it was not in the public interest. The US Dept. of Justice appealed and the US DC Circuit Court ruled that Judge Sporkin might have been biased and remanded the case, and the consent decree was eventually approved. Below are the US Department of Justice and court documents, briefs and ruling that lead to consent decree being declared valid.

  • Complaint - For Violations of Sections 1 & 2 of the Sherman Act. (USDOJ 7/15/94)
  • Consent Decree - Final Judgment. This is the consent decree that the US DOJ and Microsoft agreed to. (7/15/94)
  • Stipulation. (7/15/94)
  • Competitive Impact Statement This documents gives a run down on what Microsoft was doing and how the Consent Decree would fix things. (USDOJ 7/27/94)
  • Declaration of Economist, Kenneth J. Arrow. The Noble prize winning economists take on Microsoft and how the Consent Decree remedies the anticompetitive effects of the practices challenged in the complaint. This is an economic analysis that is readable by non-economists. (1/17/95)
  • Memorandum of the United States of America in Support of Motion to Enter Final Judgment and in Opposition to the Positions of I.D.E. Corporation and Amici (USDOJ 1/18/95)
  • Memorandum of the U.S. in Response to the Court's Inquiries Concerning "Vaporware". (USDOJ 1/27/95)
  • Response of the United States of America to Supplemental Submission of Amici Curiae (USDOJ 2/3/95)
  • Order Re Motion to Approve the Consent Decree. Judge Sporkin orders that the motion to approve the consent decree be denied. (2/14/95)
  • Court's Memorandum Re Consent Decree. Judge Sporkin finds that the proposed antitrust consent decree is not in the public interest. (2/14/95)
  • Motion for Expedited Consideration and for Briefing Schedule. (USDOJ 2/16/95)
  • Brief for Appellant United States of America (USDOJ 3/7/95)
  • Motion of United States of America to Postpone Status Conference (USDOJ 3/14/95)
  • Order Judge Sporkin cancels a scheduled meeting as both the US DOJ and Microsoft are appealing his ruling. He gives some additional observations with respect to the decision. (3/14/95)
  • Letter from AG Anne K. Bingaman to Judge Sporkin Letter about misunderstanding of sentence in a brief. (USDOJ 3/14/95)
  • Amici Curiae Brief from Gary L. Reback and other lawyers on behalf of some anonymous clients. (4/6/95)
  • Reply Brief for Appellant United States of America (USDOJ 4/10/95)
  • Oral Arguments before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (4/24/95)
  • United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Court Opinions thinks Judge Sporkin might have been biased against Microsoft. The case is remanded to the chief judge of the district court, with instructions that it be assigned to another district court judge. (6/16/95)
  • Discovery Motions (USDOJ 6/16/95)


  • Back
  • Ads by FindLaw