First Page Next Page Last Page

Judge Upholds Vioox Liability Verdict Against Merck,
But Calls $50M Trial Damages "Grossly Excessive"

Gerald D. Barnett and Corrine Barnett v. Merck & Co., Inc.

Page 1 of 8
E-mail This
  • Plaintiff's California Lawyers
  • Vioxx Injury Lawyers

    Related Resources
  • See The $51M Judgment
  • Read The Lawsuit
  • An Overview of Vioxx
  • Vioxx FAQs
  • Vioxx Links
  • Product Liability Lawyers
  • A federal judge upheld a jury's verdict that Merck is liable in the personal injury and product liability trial against Merck, but rejects the jury's $50M damage award. Judge Eldon E. Fallon called the award for compensatory damages “grossly excessive,” and “excessive under any conceivable substantive standard of excessiveness,’ Although the court upheld the jury's $1 million award of punitive damages against Merck, it said that under existing case law, a new trial was needed only to determine the amount of both compensatory and punitive damages against Merck.

    $50M verdict in second federal Vioxx lawsuit against Merck
    First Page Next Page Last Page

    Ads by FindLaw