| Monday, June 21, 2004 | Print This | Email This |
|
Donations rise, but not for all
By Stacy A. Teicher
First the stock-market rebound offered a glimmer of hope. Then
the
employment scene started brightening. Now those rays of economic
recovery
are finally improving the outlook for many American charities and other
nonprofit groups.
But the pickup in giving has been selective. The stock
market's
downturn lasted so long that broad swaths of the philanthropic
community are
still struggling. For example, human-services groups have seen two
straight
years of declines, after adjusting for inflation.
That's the mixed picture in a study to be released Monday by
the
Giving USA Foundation and researched by the Center on Philanthropy at
Indiana University. Americans donated nearly $241 billion last year, up
from
a revised estimate of $234 billion in 2002, according to the annual
study.
That extra $7 billion is enough to give 3.8 million people a $5 meal
every
day for a year.
"Our major [donor] giving is back up, and [that] is one of our
biggest indicators: Those folks are the ones that are holding the stock
portfolios and investments that kind of were tanking over the last
couple
years," says Alan Terwilleger, senior vice president for ministry
relations
at Prison Fellowship Ministries in Reston, Va. "We're running about 10
percent ahead [of the past fiscal year], so we're feeling really good
about
it," he says of the group that partners with churches to help prisoners
and
their families. He expects to raise about $30 million through direct
mail
and another $18 million from major gifts this fiscal year.
The optimism isn't felt across the board, however. Some
charities
have experienced a lag between the growing confidence in the economy
and the
flow of dollars to their coffers. Giving USA reports that while 55
percent
of the nonprofits surveyed received more money last year than the year
before, 37 percent received less.
Human-services organizations, for instance, face what some
observers call a "triple whammy" - declines in individual donations,
foundation grants, and government funding - at a time when more people
need
their assistance. After adjusting for inflation, gifts to
human-services
groups declined 1 percent last year and about 11 percent the year
before.
Most donations to these groups come from individuals giving modest
sums, so
unemployment and uncertainty about the economy probably took their
toll.
At the same time, other philanthropic sectors experienced big
gains, including international affairs (12.1 percent); health (8.2
percent);
and arts, culture, and the humanities (4.9 percent).
Different givers react differently to the economic cycle,
experts
say. "This is not to say that philanthropy is purely an economically
determined phenomenon ... but changes in economic factors can explain a
large part of changes in giving," says Patrick Rooney, director of
research
at the Center on Philanthropy. The strongest predictor of individual
giving
is the S&P 500 stock-market index. If other factors are held constant,
a
100-point increase in the index is associated with a $1.7 billion
increase
in charitable deductions, Mr. Rooney says.
Foundations tend to increase donations as stocks rise, but
because
2000 to 2002 saw the longest consecutive decline in the stock market
since
the Great Depression, foundations have taken longer to rebound. Between
2002
and 2003, foundation giving was down 4.7 percent after adjusting for
inflation. During the recession, Rooney explains, foundations may have
paid
out more than the minimum 5 percent of assets that they're required to
give,
"to help offset other factors that had an adverse effect on the
economy....
So now that the economy is in recovery mode, they are perhaps being
less
aggressive in their payout rate."
The Museum of Fine Arts in Boston has experienced that
slowdown in
foundation grants, coupled with fewer individual donations, such as
memberships for $75 to $1,000. And with a decline in visitors over the
past
few years, the museum recently decided to lay off 23 employees. "We
wanted
to be sure we ... had a budget we could live with for several years to
come," says Patricia Jacoby, deputy director for external relations.
The
museum has been promised major gifts from foundations in a year or so,
she
says, once they have had a chance to build up their assets.
One area of philanthropy less affected by the recession has
been
gifts to religious groups, because they rely so heavily on donations
from
committed members. Religious gifts increased 2 percent last
year.
At Prison Fellowship, major donors have continued to give over
the
past few years, though not to the degree that they did during the boom
in
technology stocks, Mr. Terwilleger says. "Our donors ... take
stewardship in
a serious way. They do what they can based on what the Lord provides
them
with each year financially."
One development that surprised officials at Giving USA was a
10
percent surge in bequests last year. With the estate tax being phased
out,
some feared that people would have less incentive to leave their
estates to
charity, because they can now leave more to their families tax-free.
There's
debate about what will happen, though, when the estate tax is
eliminated in
2010. Some studies suggest bequests would then go down by 20 to 30
percent,
Rooney says. But Congress could reinstate the tax as soon as
2011.
At the Greater Milwaukee Foundation, which distributes funds
to a
range of local nonprofits, bequests are on the rise after a decade of
holding steady. Foundation president Douglas Jansson notes that since
World
War II, many entrepreneurs have built up businesses with net worths of
hundreds of millions of dollars, and now they're becoming
philanthropists.
California philanthropist Ed Hogan, for instance, set up a
foundation after selling a 40-year-old family travel agency a few years
ago.
He recently announced plans to build a $5 million sanctuary for horses
injured in last fall's wildfires. "What's interesting," says Mr.
Jansson,
"is that [these business owners] are deciding not to leave everything
to
their kids. They're going through this difficult conversation in the
family
about how much is enough or how much is too much.... We're just at the
cusp
of this huge transfer of wealth."
Although the rebound may feel slow to some, Giving USA
chairman
Henry Goldstein likes the long-term upward trend of American
philanthropy.
"Despite the shaky economy, despite unemployment, despite Iraq ...
giving
remains strong," he says.
The Christian Science Monitor, csmonitor.com and other related marks used on this site are trademarks owned by The Christian Science Publishing Society. Materials may not be modified, distributed, retransmitted, or used, in whole or in part, in derivative works. All other uses, including reprinting, republishing, broadcast, or any further distribution require written permission from The Christian Science Publishing Society. |