| Monday, December 1, 2003 | Print This | Email This |
|
New legal tangle: Pirated music moves into workplace
By Tim Sprinkle
SAN FRANCISCO AND ROSEVILLE, CALIF.
- Illegal music trading on college campuses may get all the
headlines, but the practice has moved into the working world. And
unlike
student swapping, workplace piracy is about more than just one person's
Internet habits. Left unchecked, the problem can expose employers to
significant copyright liability, clog their computer resources, and
drag
down employee productivity.
Although companies have made progress addressing the issue,
the
specter of workplace trading still lurks on many corporate networks. As
a
result, companies must learn to deal with the problem, legal experts
say.
"A piracy lawsuit against a company would send such a strong
message to the infringers of the world that I can't imagine the music
industry not jumping at it if they had the chance," says Michael
Friedman, a
New York entertainment attorney whose firm helps employers handle and
avoid
copyright infringements on their systems. "It's a fine line for
companies
that want to address the problem - they don't want to stick their necks
out
too far and get in trouble themselves, but they don't want to be overly
intrusive into the privacy of the people they employ."
The problem of workplace music swapping came to the fore a
year
ago, when the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) sent a
letter
to members of the Fortune 1000. The letter warned of the potential for
legal
action and the problems that trading can create - from lost efficiency
to
overtaxed computer systems.
So far, the RIAA's approach to workplace trading has mirrored
its
other campaigns: educate the public about the risks and, when
necessary,
enforce copyrights under the law. According to association officials,
that
tactic seems to be working.
"We're at a point now where most responsible companies out
there
'get it,' " says Matt Oppenheim, RIAA senior vice president, noting
that
enforcement actions against corporations have been few and far between.
"They don't want to expose themselves to copyright liability, they
don't
want their networks opened up to viruses and confidentiality breaches,
and
they don't want to see their employees downloading music when they
should be
working. There's been huge progress in the last couple of
years."
To further reduce the possibility of a lawsuit, companies can
take
advantage of guidelines offered by the Digital Millennium Copyright
Act,
says Jeff Karp, a technology attorney in Washington, D.C.
Those steps include establishing a companywide usage policy
that
addresses illegal downloads, creating mechanisms to ensure that the
policy
is enforced, and responding to any infractions that come to their
attention.
Following these provisions essentially insulates the company
by
transferring liability back to the individual user, Mr. Karp says. "A
large
part of the problem is that many people don't realize what they're
doing is
wrong."
Even so, employees can listen to music on their computers and
stay
within the law. Karp suggests bringing CDs from home or downloading
music
from legal Web services like Apple's iTunes. "Playing a CD on a
computer is
no different than putting it in the CD player at home," he says. The
trouble
starts when those songs are loaded onto a network and shared among
users.
The potential for legal action is just one problem for
businesses
facing music piracy. By some estimates, Internet downloads clog over 40
percent of computer servers in the United States - slowing company
websites,
overtaxing internal systems, and sapping hours of worker
productivity.
To address these issues, a number of software packages are
available to help monitor network users, restrict the kinds of files
that
can be downloaded (allowing, say, PDF documents but not MP3 music
files),
and generally help officers enforce their computer-usage
policies.
At the end of the day, "the primary motivation for a company
to
[look into anti-piracy measures] is often corporate productivity," says
John
Matera, president of Cobion Corp., a Massachusetts firm that develops
software that helps companies manage their internal networks.
"Employees
that simply aren't doing what they're supposed to do can be a huge
burden on
the company."
But such tools can create as many problems as they solve -
from
encouraging an atmosphere of mistrust in the workplace, to overstepping
the
bounds of employee privacy, says Milton Olin, former chief operating
officer
of Napster, who now works as an entertainment attorney in Los
Angeles.
He suggests officers look closely at their own corporate
culture
before taking any drastic new step to control their information
technology
(IT).
"It's all about finding the appropriate standard for your
organization," he says. "These days, most IT folks know what is going
on
with their networks. But it's taking that knowledge and not doing
anything
about it - that's the problem."
The Christian Science Monitor, csmonitor.com and other related marks used on this site are trademarks owned by The Christian Science Publishing Society. Materials may not be modified, distributed, retransmitted, or used, in whole or in part, in derivative works. All other uses, including reprinting, republishing, broadcast, or any further distribution require written permission from The Christian Science Publishing Society. |