FindLaw | For the Public | For Small Business | For Legal Professionals | Find a Lawyer
   
WAR ON TERROR
IRAQ COVERAGE
Search News
 News Front Page
Business
Civil Rights
Crime
Environment
Immigration
Labor
Personal Injury
Politics
Product Liability
Supreme Court
Tech & IP 
 Commentary
 International
 Entertainment
 Sports
 Book Reviews
 Weather
 News Wires
Andrews Publications
Associated Press
Washington File 
 The Spin Room
 Featured Docs
 Special Coverage
Wednesday, May 7, 2008 Print This | Email This     

Housing rescue package set for House vote

By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - A broad housing rescue package aimed at preventing foreclosures would have the government step in to insure up to $300 billion in new mortgages for struggling homeowners.

The plan, designed to stabilize a key sector of the shaky economy, is set for a House vote Wednesday. It would let the Federal Housing Administration insure more affordable fixed-rate loans for borrowers currently too financially strapped to qualify.


The White House says President Bush would veto the measure, calling it a burdensome bailout that would open taxpayers to too much risk. That's despite Democrats' attempts to attract Republican support by including a grab-bag of measures Bush has called for.

They include legislation to overhaul the Federal Housing Administration, the Depression-era mortgage insurer, and to more tightly regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that finance home loans. Also part of the plan is a measure, which Bush has repeatedly requested, allowing state and local housing finance agencies to use tax-exempt bonds to refinance distressed subprime mortgages.

Its main element, written by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the Financial Services Committee chairman, is designed to help roughly 500,000 borrowers at a cost of $2.7 billion over the next five years. Under Frank's bill, the FHA would relax its standards to let debt-ridden homeowners refinance into more affordable, fixed-rate mortgages if their lenders agreed to take substantial losses on the original loans.

Borrowers would have to show they could afford to make payments on the new mortgages. They would have to share with FHA at least half of their proceeds if they profited from selling or refinancing again.

Frank, working closely on his plan with Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, has picked up some Republican support, especially among lawmakers representing areas hit hardest by the housing crisis.

But GOP leaders strongly oppose the bill, which they say would help reckless borrowers who overextended themselves, unscrupulous lenders, and investors who tried to game the market at the expense of renters and homeowners who made wiser choices.

The plan is to be combined with $11 billion in housing tax breaks, including a $7,500 credit for first-time home-buyers that would function like a zero-interest government loan, to be paid off over 15 years.

As part of the package, the House is scheduled to vote on an amendment - bitterly opposed by the financial services industry but championed by governors - that would ensure that neither the FHA plan nor other banking laws pre-empt state foreclosure laws. It's aimed at letting states that have recently moved to make it harder to evict homeowners continue those efforts.

The House also plans a vote on a separate bill - also facing a veto threat - to send $15 billion to states for the purchase and rehabilitation of foreclosed properties in the hardest-hit areas.

Critics say it would reward lenders, many of whom are in part to blame for the housing chaos, and act as an incentive for them to foreclose rather than find ways to help struggling borrowers stay in their homes.

2008-05-07     10:19:39 GMT

Copyright 2008
The Associated Press All Rights Reserved
The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authorityof The Associated Press.
  FindLaw's Writ
Is Lethal Injection Cruel?
A Perspective on the Comparison Between Animal Euthanasia and Lethal Injection.
By Sherry Colb

Coming Thursday:
Columnist Marci Hamilton

   Legal Technology
Corporate America And Uncle Sam Need To Wake Up To E-Discovery and E-FOIA Obligations, Part Two
by Eric Sinrod

Metadata: Ethical Obligations of the Witting and Unwitting Recipient
by David Hricik & Chase Edward Scott

  Featured Documents

Spitzer Call Girl Files $10M Suit Against 'Girls Gone Wild'
[HTML File]

Hells Angels Founder Sues HBO
[HTML File]

Judge Awards >$1M in Legal Fees to One Congressman in Suit Against Another [PDF File]

N.Y. Gov., Ex-AG Eliot Spitzer Embroiled in Prostitution Scandal
[PDF File]

Va. Supreme Court Uphold’s Felony Spam Conviction
[PDF File]

Mitchell Report on Doping, Drugs in Baseball
[PDF File]

Michael Vick’s Plea Agreement, Statement of Facts, Indictment
[HTML Files]

Federal Indictment of Barry Bonds in Investigation of Athletes and Drugs
[HTML File]

Former High-Level Democratic Fundraiser Norman Hsu Indicted
[HTML File]

Topic Index

Submit Your Docs...

FREE Breaking Docs Newsletter

FindLaw Poll
Will Uma Thurman's Accused Stalker Be Found Guilty
Yes
No
Maybe
Ask The Jurors
[See Results...]


  FindLaw.com LEGAL NEWS:  Top Headlines · Supreme Court · Commentary · Crime · Cyberspace · International
US FEDERAL LAW:  Constitution · Codes · Supreme Court Opinions · Circuit Opinions
US STATE LAW:  State Constitutions · State Codes · Case Law
RESEARCH:  Dictionary · Forms · LawCrawler · Library · Summaries of Law
LEGAL SUBJECTS:  Constitutional · Intellectual Property · Criminal · Labor · more...
GOVERNMENT RESOURCES:  US Federal · US State · Directories · more...
INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES:  Country Guides · Trade · World Constitutions · more...
COMMUNITY:   Newsletters · Message Boards · Greedy Associates Boards
TOOLS:  Email · West WorkSpace · FirmSites
Advertising Info · Help · Comments Jobs@FindLaw · Site Map
Company | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer Copyright © 1994-2008 FindLaw