FindLaw | For the Public | For Small Business | For Legal Professionals | Find a Lawyer
   
WAR ON TERROR
IRAQ COVERAGE
Search News
 News Front Page
Business
Civil Rights
Crime
Environment
Immigration
Labor
Personal Injury
Politics
Product Liability
Supreme Court
Tech & IP 
 Commentary
 International
 Entertainment
 Sports
 Book Reviews
 Weather
 News Wires
Andrews Publications
Associated Press
Washington File 
 The Spin Room
 Featured Docs
 Special Coverage
Tuesday, May 6, 2008 Print This | Email This     

White House says farm bill cost still too high

By MARY CLARE JALONICK Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - The White House told members of Congress on Tuesday that the cost of the five-year farm bill is still too high, saying negotiators are using budget gimmicks to hide the real expense.

The cost of the almost $300 billion bill and the amount of subsidies directed toward wealthy farmers remain the major sticking points between the White House and both Democratic and GOP negotiators. President Bush has threatened to veto the legislation.


Negotiators are weighing reports from congressional budget experts on what the bill would cost under several scenarios. They are now considering eliminating some government payments to those who make more than $750,000 in farm income annually, according to two people familiar with the negotiations who requested anonymity because they are not authorized to speak publicly.

That would be closer to the White House's proposal on limiting the subsidies. The Bush administration originally proposed a cap for those who make more than $200,000 in average annual farm income, but has signaled that it could accept a limit of $500,000.

Negotiators last week proposed eliminating some subsidies for all of those who make more than $950,000 in farm income, a proposal that was swiftly rejected by the White House.

Georgia Sen. Saxby Chambliss, a Republican, said he heard from the White House on Tuesday with the complaint that the bill was still too costly. Negotiators reached an agreement last month on how to pay for $10 billion over 10 years in extra spending for the massive bill, but the White House is now arguing that agreement would result in an even higher cost, Chambliss said.

White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said the spending argument was not new.

"For quite some time, we've said that the accounting gimmicks and budget tricks greatly inflate the overall cost of the bill," he said.

Chambliss said he would work to override the bill if the White House vetoes it. The Georgia senator has long been a proponent of higher subsidies as Southern cotton and rice farms cost more to operate.

"We've known all along we'd have to make some changes and we've made significant changes," he said.

North Dakota Sen. Kent Conrad said the White House is making up its own rules, and negotiators will continue to rely on congressional budget scores. He said a veto override would be "a tough mountain to climb."

Negotiators said they would continue discussions with the White House on Wednesday and strive to find ways to save money.

Two-thirds of the bill would pay for food stamps, and negotiators have allocated more than $10 billion in extra dollars for nutrition programs. The legislation would also increase grants to fruit and vegetable farmers and boost conservation programs that are designed to protect the land.

2008-05-07     01:23:39 GMT

Copyright 2008
The Associated Press All Rights Reserved
The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authorityof The Associated Press.
  FindLaw's Writ
Is Lethal Injection Cruel?
A Perspective on the Comparison Between Animal Euthanasia and Lethal Injection.
By Sherry Colb

Coming Thursday:
Columnist Marci Hamilton

   Legal Technology
Corporate America And Uncle Sam Need To Wake Up To E-Discovery and E-FOIA Obligations, Part Two
by Eric Sinrod

Metadata: Ethical Obligations of the Witting and Unwitting Recipient
by David Hricik & Chase Edward Scott

  Featured Documents

Spitzer Call Girl Files $10M Suit Against 'Girls Gone Wild'
[HTML File]

Hells Angels Founder Sues HBO
[HTML File]

Judge Awards >$1M in Legal Fees to One Congressman in Suit Against Another [PDF File]

N.Y. Gov., Ex-AG Eliot Spitzer Embroiled in Prostitution Scandal
[PDF File]

Va. Supreme Court Uphold’s Felony Spam Conviction
[PDF File]

Mitchell Report on Doping, Drugs in Baseball
[PDF File]

Michael Vick’s Plea Agreement, Statement of Facts, Indictment
[HTML Files]

Federal Indictment of Barry Bonds in Investigation of Athletes and Drugs
[HTML File]

Former High-Level Democratic Fundraiser Norman Hsu Indicted
[HTML File]

Topic Index

Submit Your Docs...

FREE Breaking Docs Newsletter

FindLaw Poll
Will Uma Thurman's Accused Stalker Be Found Guilty
Yes
No
Maybe
Ask The Jurors
[See Results...]


  FindLaw.com LEGAL NEWS:  Top Headlines · Supreme Court · Commentary · Crime · Cyberspace · International
US FEDERAL LAW:  Constitution · Codes · Supreme Court Opinions · Circuit Opinions
US STATE LAW:  State Constitutions · State Codes · Case Law
RESEARCH:  Dictionary · Forms · LawCrawler · Library · Summaries of Law
LEGAL SUBJECTS:  Constitutional · Intellectual Property · Criminal · Labor · more...
GOVERNMENT RESOURCES:  US Federal · US State · Directories · more...
INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES:  Country Guides · Trade · World Constitutions · more...
COMMUNITY:   Newsletters · Message Boards · Greedy Associates Boards
TOOLS:  Email · West WorkSpace · FirmSites
Advertising Info · Help · Comments Jobs@FindLaw · Site Map
Company | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer Copyright © 1994-2008 FindLaw