FindLaw | For the Public | For Small Business | For Legal Professionals | Find a Lawyer
   
WAR ON TERROR
IRAQ COVERAGE
Search News
 News Front Page
Business
Civil Rights
Crime
Environment
Immigration
Labor
Personal Injury
Politics
Product Liability
Supreme Court
Tech & IP 
 Commentary
 International
 Entertainment
 Sports
 Book Reviews
 Weather
 News Wires
Andrews Publications
Associated Press
Washington File 
 The Spin Room
 Featured Docs
 Special Coverage
Wednesday, Jul. 12, 2006 Print This | Email This     
Andrews Logo Thomson Logo

Lost Screenplay Files Worth $27K, Not Millions, Calif. Court Says

By DONNA HIGGINS, Andrews Publications Staff Writer

An Internet provider whose technician erased three screenplays from a computer while attempting to install DSL service will have to pay the writer only $27,000 and not the millions the writer was seeking, a California appellate court has ruled.

The 2d District Court of Appeal affirmed a jury's verdict that plaintiff Nicholas Boyd was partially responsible for the loss because he failed to back up his data and because he installed a large number of new files onto his computer after the screenplays were lost, which likely prevented the deleted data from being recovered.


The appeals court reversed the jury's award of $33,000 in punitive damages against SBC Advanced Solutions Inc.

Boyd sued SBC, alleging that a technician from the company deleted three screenplays from Boyd's computer Dec. 14, 2000, while trying to install a "digital subscriber line," a form of high-speed Internet access.

A computer expert was unable to recover the screenplays.

Boyd claimed he had a multimillion-dollar contract for the screenplays to be produced and that he should be compensated for the lost deal.

A Los Angeles County Superior Court jury found SBC was negligent and awarded Boyd $60,000 in compensatory damages and $33,000 in punitives.

The jury found Boyd 55 percent responsible for the lost screenplays, so SBC would have to pay only $27,000 of the compensatory award.

Both sides appealed to the Court of Appeal. Boyd argued that the jury's damage award was too low, while SBC argued that no punitive damages should have been awarded.

The appellate panel agreed with SBC that Boyd is not entitled to punitive damages because the jury found SBC was negligent, but that it did not commit an intentional tort.

The verdict form allowed the imposition of punitive damages only if SBC were found to have acted intentionally, the panel pointed out.

The panel found no merit in Boyd's appeal. Based on the evidence presented by both sides, the jury could have reasonably concluded that Boyd did not have a contract for the sale of the screenplays, but that he should be compensated for expenses incurred in researching and writing them, the panel said.

Boyd also argued that he should receive all of the $60,000 compensatory damages award, but the panel disagreed. The evidence showed Boyd backed up one of his screenplays onto a floppy disk, so he could have done the same with the other two, but did not.

The evidence also showed Boyd or someone authorized by him installed more than 4,000 new files onto his computer immediately after the screenplays were lost.

Deleted data remains on a computer disk and can often be recovered if no new data has overwritten it. The thousands of new files likely overwrote the deleted screenplays and made it impossible for the lost data to be recovered, the panel said.



Boyd v. SBC Advanced Solutions Inc., No. B181807, 2006 WL 1828132 (Cal. Ct. App., 2d Dist., Div. 2 July 5, 2006).
Computer & Internet Litigation Reporter
Volume 24, Issue 03
07/12/2006

Copyright 2006
West, a Thomson business. All Rights Reserved.
  FindLaw's Writ
Is Lethal Injection Cruel?
A Perspective on the Comparison Between Animal Euthanasia and Lethal Injection.
By Sherry Colb

Coming Thursday:
Columnist Marci Hamilton

   Legal Technology
Corporate America And Uncle Sam Need To Wake Up To E-Discovery and E-FOIA Obligations, Part Two
by Eric Sinrod

Metadata: Ethical Obligations of the Witting and Unwitting Recipient
by David Hricik & Chase Edward Scott

  Featured Documents

Spitzer Call Girl Files $10M Suit Against 'Girls Gone Wild'
[HTML File]

Hells Angels Founder Sues HBO
[HTML File]

Judge Awards >$1M in Legal Fees to One Congressman in Suit Against Another [PDF File]

N.Y. Gov., Ex-AG Eliot Spitzer Embroiled in Prostitution Scandal
[PDF File]

Va. Supreme Court Uphold’s Felony Spam Conviction
[PDF File]

Mitchell Report on Doping, Drugs in Baseball
[PDF File]

Michael Vick’s Plea Agreement, Statement of Facts, Indictment
[HTML Files]

Federal Indictment of Barry Bonds in Investigation of Athletes and Drugs
[HTML File]

Former High-Level Democratic Fundraiser Norman Hsu Indicted
[HTML File]

Topic Index

Submit Your Docs...

FREE Breaking Docs Newsletter

FindLaw Poll
Will Uma Thurman's Accused Stalker Be Found Guilty
Yes
No
Maybe
Ask The Jurors
[See Results...]


  FindLaw.com LEGAL NEWS:  Top Headlines · Supreme Court · Commentary · Crime · Cyberspace · International
US FEDERAL LAW:  Constitution · Codes · Supreme Court Opinions · Circuit Opinions
US STATE LAW:  State Constitutions · State Codes · Case Law
RESEARCH:  Dictionary · Forms · LawCrawler · Library · Summaries of Law
LEGAL SUBJECTS:  Constitutional · Intellectual Property · Criminal · Labor · more...
GOVERNMENT RESOURCES:  US Federal · US State · Directories · more...
INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES:  Country Guides · Trade · World Constitutions · more...
COMMUNITY:   Newsletters · Message Boards · Greedy Associates Boards
TOOLS:  Email · West WorkSpace · FirmSites
Advertising Info · Help · Comments Jobs@FindLaw · Site Map
Company | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer Copyright © 1994-2008 FindLaw